Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:37
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
How conservative the Japanese people really is? And the government?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
World Aquatics Takes Tough Stance on Enhanced Games - Newser
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Disney and Universal’s Lawsuit Against Midjourney, Explained - Vulture
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Should a male with long hair comb his hair daily?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.